Legal Opinion

Daggett v. Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 9, 1999No. 99-1187PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal, by applicants whose motion to intervene was denied, stems from Maine’s enactment in November 1996 of a set of campaign reform statutes. Adopted by Maine voters through a ballot initiative, the statute — denominated “An Act to Reform Campaign Finance” (“the Reform Act”) — included both public funding of state campaigns and extensive regulation of contributions and expenditures. 1996 Me. Legis. Serv. Initiated Bill eh. 5 (I.B.5) (L.D.1823) (West).

The public financing provisions, called the Maine Clean Election Act, Me.Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 21-A, § 1121 et seq.,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Mangual v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. R & G Mortgage Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API