Daggett v. Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election Practices
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, by applicants whose motion to intervene was denied, stems from Maine’s enactment in November 1996 of a set of campaign reform statutes. Adopted by Maine voters through a ballot initiative, the statute — denominated “An Act to Reform Campaign Finance” (“the Reform Act”) — included both public funding of state campaigns and extensive regulation of contributions and expenditures. 1996 Me. Legis. Serv. Initiated Bill eh. 5 (I.B.5) (L.D.1823) (West).
The public financing provisions, called the Maine Clean Election Act, Me.Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 21-A, § 1121 et seq.,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Mangual v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- R & G Mortgage Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.