Legal Opinion

Lorber v. Rosow

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 16, 1944No. Civil Action No. 1080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

This is an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, June 25, 1938, c. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219, against an employer to recover unpaid overtime, statutory compensation, attorney’s fees, and costs. The defendant is owner of a wholesale drug and liquor business; the plaintiff, a former employee who was in charge of the drug department shipping room.

The case raises a number of questions under the Act. The business of the employer is claimed in this action to be in interstate commerce insofar as he (1) orders and receives goods from, and (2)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  2. Warren Harold Oliver v. Mercy Medical Center, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Donovan v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  4. Walling v. NewmanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  5. Swick v. Glenn L. Martin Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API