Legal Opinion

State v. McNichols

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1941No. 6911PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C.J.

— Respondent was charged and convicted of the crime of “willfully, unlawfully and knowingly permit [permitting] to be played and conducted in a house owned by him, the said James E. McNichols, to-wit: a place known as the Shamrock Club, a game of chance, to-wit: cards, dice, slot machines and roulette, for money, checks and credit * * * The devices were duly seized under a search warrant and thereafter and subsequent to respondent’s conviction, were, by the District Court, ordered destroyed under the provisions of Section 17-2304 I. C. A. The money found in the devices after seizure, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosen v. Superintendent of Police Le StrangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. J. B. Mullen & Co. v. MoseleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fairmount Engine Co. v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Dorrell v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lee on v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Replogle v. Joyland ClubMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Commonwealth v. AltizerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Pepple v. HeadrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API