Legal Opinion

Fairless v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1933No. 6314-6319PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The petitioners in the six cases, grouped under the above style, were all stockholders in the Union Finance Company, an Ohio corporation, which by corporate action taken in October, 1922, transferred all of its assets to the Metropolitan Securities Company on January 4,1923. The transferor in exchange received a certificate for 5,886 shares of the preferred stock of the purchasing company, and shortly- thereafter distributed the stock through a transfer agent to its own stockholders, share for share. The Union Finance Company thereupon ceased to do business, though it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Avery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  2. Hamlen v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  3. Abegg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  4. Bates Motor Transport Lines, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  5. Herder v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API