Legal Opinion
United States v. Forster
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 6, 2013No. 11-2230UnpublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, Defendant-Appellant Robert Walter Forster was convicted of failure to comply with the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SOR-NA”), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 16913. The conviction stemmed from Mr. Forster’s failure to register or update his registration as required by SORNA. Mr. Forster appeals from his conviction and sentence, raising four claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to convict him of knowingly “failing to register” under SORNA; (2) the district court erred as a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Ibarra-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Johnny EscalanteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Trevon BarcusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.