Legal Opinion
Best Buy Co., Inc. v. HARLEM-IRVING COMPANIES
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 3, 1999No. 98 C 926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEVIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending is Defendant The Harlem-Irving Companies, Inc’s. (“Harlem-Irving”) Motion for Summary Judgment, which requests a finding of partial non-liability under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is denied, with the exception of an accord and satisfaction issue discussed herein.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1
Defendant Harlem-Irving operates an enclosed shopping mall in the Chicagoland area. Best Buy Company, Inc. (“Best Buy”) is one of the tenants in that shopping mall. Best Buy is a leading…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gooch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frank P. Randazzo, as Trustee for Frank P. Randazzo Declaration of Trust Dated July 18, 1997 v. Harris Bank Palatine, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Peterson v. Berg (In Re Berg)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- ITQ Lata, LLC v. MB Financial Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Olde Discount Corp. v. YoungDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Randazzo, Frank P. v. Harris Bank PalatineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001