Legal Opinion
In Re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 15, 2002No. 01-10578PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is opened before the Court upon motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 to transfer to this Court certain personal injury claims against the movants pending in various United States District Courts based on allegations of exposure to asbestos in products designed to resist heat caused by friction (the “Friction Products Claims”). The movants are Daimler-Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”), Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and General Motors (collectively with the previously listed parties the “Big Three”), Honeywell International, Inc. (“Honeywell”) and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Dow Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Irwin Halper v. Barry HalperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Fellheimer, Eichen & Braverman, P.C. v. Charter Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re: Combustion Engineering, Inc. First State Insurance Company Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Retirement Sys. of Alabama v. JP MORGAN CHASEDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
- Hopkins v. Plant Insulation Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Superior Contracting Grp. Inc. v. Rachmale (In re LTC Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.