Legal Opinion

Haddy v. Tobias

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Peck, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is ejectment for an undivided one-fourth of 120 acres of land.

Jacob Haddy died intestate, leaving four children,— plaintiff, defendant, and two others, — and this farm. Defendant claimed title under a deed executed by Jacob Haddy in his life-time, but plaintiff claimed that the deed, although executed by Jacob Haddy in his life-time, was by him deposited in the hands of, a third party, to be delivered after his death, and consequently never passed the title.

II. Tobias was sworn, and testified that he was defendant's husband; that his wife claimed to own the land under the deed from Jacob…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hodson v. Van FossenMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keller v. KellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Carby v. CombsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Farrand v. KavanaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Austin v. CrowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API