Haddy v. Tobias
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Peck, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is ejectment for an undivided one-fourth of 120 acres of land.
Jacob Haddy died intestate, leaving four children,— plaintiff, defendant, and two others, — and this farm. Defendant claimed title under a deed executed by Jacob Haddy in his life-time, but plaintiff claimed that the deed, although executed by Jacob Haddy in his life-time, was by him deposited in the hands of, a third party, to be delivered after his death, and consequently never passed the title.
II. Tobias was sworn, and testified that he was defendant's husband; that his wife claimed to own the land under the deed from Jacob…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hodson v. Van FossenMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keller v. KellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Carby v. CombsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Farrand v. KavanaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Austin v. CrowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1916