Hodson v. Van Fossen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This is an action of ejectment for about eleven acres of' *69land, situated near the city of Tpsilanti. The premises demanded embrace a parcel of some three acres, having a dwelling house, where Hodson, who was defendant below, resided Yvith his wife.
The only questions in the case relate to this parcel, there being no controversy about the residue. Van Fossen recovered, judgment for the whole premises. It was conceded, on the trial, that Mrs. Hodson was in under a deed from Mrs. Van Fossen, wife of the plaintiff below. It also appeared that Mrs. Van Fossen’s title depended upon a deed to her by…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Henry v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Rowe v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Sexton v. SutherlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Cleaver v. BigelowMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Bunce v. BidwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.