Legal Opinion

Brandon McGrath v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 49A04-1610-CR-2270PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKirsch, Judge

Statement of the Case1

After law enforcement officers followed up on a tip from CrimeStoppers, they requested a warrant to use thermal imaging technology to gain additional evidence to confirm whether an active indoor marijuana grow operation existed at the location designated in the tip. The warrant was granted and the results of the imaging showed higher than normal heat signatures emanating from an upstairs area of the house at that address. Officers requested a search warrant for the premises based on evidence presented in both search warrant applications.

Issue

The dispositive question here…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brandon McGrath v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API