Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1993No. 721 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

Clare W. McClellan (McClellan) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), which granted Bell Telephone Company’s (Bell) motion to strike McClellan’s exceptions, adopted the initial decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), and dismissed McClellan’s complaint against Bell.

McClellan is a telephone customer who alleges that his telephone line had been illegally wiretapped for the two years *677prior to his complaint. He wrote Bell several letters demanding that Bell check his phone line and inform him if it was being wiretapped. In these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kviatkovsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. E.L.G. Enterprises Corp. v. Gulf Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. U S West Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. United Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API