Legal Opinion

Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Mashburn

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1959No. 40960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobbrds, P. J.

The question for decision herein is whether appellant Railroad has a fee simple title to, or a mere easement in and over, a strip of land, comprising 5.45 acres, described in the bill, and being a part of the right-of-way of said Railroad. The chancellor held that the Railroad has only an easement. The question has given us much concern. A majority of the Court has concluded that the Railroad has a fee. The solution of the question rests in the interpretation of the terms of the deed to the predecessor of appellant Railroad, in the light of the pertinent facts and circumstances extrinsic of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Orleans & Northeastern R. R. v. MorrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Whelan v. JohnstonMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mississippi Cent. R. R. v. RatcliffMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Jones v. New Orleans & N. E. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Martin v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Johnson v. Kansas City SouthernDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2004
  3. Johnson v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Dossett v. New Orleans Great Northern Railroad Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Crum v. ButlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API