Legal Opinion
Godfrey v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 31, 2000No. 42985-0-IPublished
1Opinion of the Court
993 P.2d 281 (2000)
99 Wash.App. 216
John A. GODFREY, Respondent,
v.
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant.
No. 42985-0-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
January 31, 2000.
Linda B. Clapham, Charles C. Huber, Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP, Seattle, for Appellant.
Tom Chambers, Seattle, for Respondent.
BAKER, J.
An insurance policy provided for binding arbitration to determine the insured's eligibility to recover damages from under-insured motorist coverage, but also provided that either party could request a trial de novo to determine the amount of damages.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Burkhart v. HarrodWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Fannie Harrison v. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.