Rabek v. Kellum

Melton, Justice.

In this discretionary appeal regarding the equitable division of retirement benefits pursuant to a divorce decree, William Rabek appeals, contending that the trial court erred by failing to exclude from division an amount from his federal pension plan equivalent to social security benefits he would have otherwise been paid. Pretermitting the efficacy of Rabek’s contention, see Cornbleth v. Cornbleth, 580 A2d 369 (Pa. Super. 1990), he failed to provide the trial court with any evidence of the amount, if any, which should have been excluded, and as such, the trial court did not…