Courtney v. Courtney
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hunt, Justice.
We granted this interlocutory appeal to address for the first time whether unvested retirement funds are subject to claims for alimony or equitable division of property, and, if not, whether evidence concerning them is otherwise relevant. The trial court denied the husband’s motion in limine urging exclusion of any evidence of his unvested retirement plan.
The parties were married for eighteen years and have two children still in their minority. The wife filed for divorce seeking their custody, child support, alimony and equitable division of the marital assets. The husband…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Marriage of Janssen v. JanssenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Robert C. S. v. Barbara J. S.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Goldstein v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Holler v. HollerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Hipps v. HippsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Andrews v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.