Legal Opinion
State v. Starks
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 14, 2006No. AC 24666PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
In this appeal, the defendant, Lenoris Starks, challenges the denial of his motion to suppress, which was heard and decided during his jury trial. After that trial, the defendant was convicted of possession of a hallucinogenic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (b), possession of a hallucinogenic substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b), possession of a hallucinogenic substance with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a public housing project in violation of General Statutes §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Raymond J. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BritoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. FarrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. StarksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. WilloughbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014