Legal Opinion

Kinley v. Bierly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 Sharon Kinley has appealed the trial court’s October 6, 2004 order granting summary judgment to Sharon Bierly and David Schon in this personal injury action. We affirm.

¶ 2 Appellant and Appellee Bierly both owned horses and were boarding them on Appellee Schon’s premises. Appellant was bitten by Appellee Bierly’s horse, Dollar, when Appellant was feeding her own horse in a stall in Appellee Schon’s barn. This personal injury action ensued. Appellees filed motions for summary judgment based on the fact that Appellant failed to demonstrate, following discovery, that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Capek v. DevitoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. McCarthy v. Dan Lepore & Sons Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. 220 Partnership v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Bender v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Andrews v. Smith Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re:Estate of Krasinski, S. Appeal of:KrasinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Baybrook, H. v. Bologna, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. Calisto, M. v. Rodgers, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Jones, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Long, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API