Legal Opinion

Lin v. Suavei, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 13, 2023No. 3:20-cv-00862Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JADE LIN, et al, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0862-L-AHG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL [ECF NO. 120-1.] 14 SUAVEI, INC., et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Counterclaimant Frank DeJoy’s (“DeJoy”) motion to 19 seal. (Mot. Seal at 2 [ECF No. 120-1 (“Mot.”).) Neither Plaintiffs nor Defendant Suavei 20 filed an opposition. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and 21 denied in part. 22 Sealing court records implicates the "general…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API