Legal Opinion

Davis v. Coopers & Lybrand

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 9, 1992No. 90 C 7173PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Investors in two commodity pool limited partnerships, Advanced Portfolio Management, Limited Partnership (“Advanced”) and Compass Futures Fund (“Compass”), bring this class action against numerous defendants related in various ways to Stot-ler Funds, Inc. (“S Funds”), general partner and operator of the two pools. In an action that stems from the assertedly fraudulent diversion of several million dollars in pool funds, plaintiffs invoke a wide array of federal and state statutes.

Their federal claims are brought under Commodity Exchange Act…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kolbeck v. LIT America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P 27,378 Glenn Damato, Deborah Damato, Ann De La Garza v. John Hermanson, First Commercial Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. In Re Soybean Futures LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. In Re Agape LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API