Legal Opinion
Loesch v. Koehler
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1896No. 17,505PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From the Allen Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
Action and recovery by the appellee against the appellants for causing the death of two of. his horses. The case comes to this court on reserved questions of law under section 630, R. S. 1881 (section 642, R. S. 1894). The appellee denies the sufficiency of the record bécause of the general character of the notice given to the lower court of the intention of the appellants to so reserve and present such questions. The character and the sufficiency of the notice are, as a general rule, questions for the trial court, the object of the notice being to enable that court to prepare the special…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Lincoln v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
- Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Shugart v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Modern Loan Co. v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Randall v. PatchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Aufderheide v. FulkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Anderson v. GeorgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
- Waud v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.