Legal Opinion

Placentia Cooperative Orange Growers Ass'n v. Henning

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1931No. Docket No. 173PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

In this action judgment was rendered in favor of defendant at the conclusion of a trial wherein the issues raised by the pleadings were submitted to a jury which returned a verdict for defendant. From the judgment thus rendered and from the court’s order refusing a new trial, plaintiff has appealed.

The cause of action alleged in the complaint was for the recovery of a sum of money as liquidated damages arising from the breach of a contract made by respondent with appellant. From the record herein, it appears that at all times material to the controversy, appellant was a nonprofit. association…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. YeomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Law v. Northern Assurance Co. of LondonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Poultry Producers of Central California, Inc. v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Leffingwell v. FaubionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API