Rachmil v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
In the United States District Court for the District of Washington, Northern Division, appellant was adjudged guilty upon an indictment charging an offense under section 29b of the Bankruptcy Act as amended (11 USCA § 52(b). In substance, the indictment sets forth that on February 21, 1929, he was a dealer in furniture in the city of Seattle, under the name of Bell Town Furniture Company; that on that day an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against him in the United States District Court for that district; that pursuant to the prayer of the petition he was, on March 25, 1929, duly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lámar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Marcus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- Steigman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Dilworth v. BootheCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. Jerome G. BeeryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.