Legal Opinion
Madely v. RadioShack Corp.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided October 23, 2007No. 2006AP2918PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURLEY, EJ.
¶ 1. William Madely and James Borland appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims that they were improperly classified as exempt from overtime payments, denying their motion for partial summary judgment, and granting summary judgment to RadioShack. Madely and Borland argue that: (1) the trial court erred by weighing the evidence in RadioShack's favor where there were disputed questions of material fact; and (2) a trial is required because a jury could find that RadioShack Y 1 store managers do not exercise discretionary power and do not have the requisite authority regarding…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Burger King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Stephen A. Ale v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christopher Kieninger v. Crown Equipment CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Weissman v. Tyson Prepared Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
- Lang v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- Christopher Kieninger v. Crown Equipment CorporationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- Cristian M. Loga-Negru v. Robert MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.