Legal Opinion

Scurlock Oil Co. v. Birchfield

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 31, 1981No. 18012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASS, Justice.

Appellee recovered judgment for $229,700 for personal injuries sustained while sanding an oil slick roadway.

In two points of error appellant urges that: (1) appellant owed no legal duty to appellee because appellee was not within the class of persons that the appellant had a duty to protect and, (2) appellant’s negligence in spilling the oil on the roadway had come to rest and appellee’s subsequent accident was an isolated, unforeseeable occurrence.

Appellee contends that appellant did owe a legal duty to him and that his injury was proximately caused by the appellant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hopson v. Gulf Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Shell Chemical Company v. LambTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Enloe v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Holler v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Henry v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  2. Moorhead v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
  3. Gray v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. James Brett Cummings v. Conner MacHine, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API