Legal Opinion
Moorhead v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 19, 1986No. M-81-127-CA, M-83-65-CA and M-83-140-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
STEGER, District Judge.
On February 18-21, 1985, came on for trial before the Court, without a jury, the above entitled and numbered consolidated cases and the Court having now heard all testimony presented by the respective parties and having considered all other evidence and exhibits admitted, hereby enters its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in this cause in conformity with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52. Any finding of fact which constitutes a conclusion of law shall be deemed a conclusion of law and any conclusion of law which constitutes…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crisman v. Cooper Industries, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Pearl Davis, of the Estate of Raymond E. Davis, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Daniels v. Tew Mac Aero Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,403 Juan Jaurequi v. John Deere Company and Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Universal Computers (Systems) Ltd. v. Datamedia Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.