Legal Opinion

People v. Edwards

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1988No. A032616PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

Defendant was convicted by the court, sitting without a jury, on four counts of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1) following denial of her claim of a clergy-penitent privilege (Evid. Code, §§ 1030- 1034). On appeal from the order granting probation, we affirmed the determination of the trial court. We granted rehearing to reconsider defendant’s claim that inculpatory statements made by her to Father Rankin, an Episcopalian priest, were in the nature of a sacramental confession or “penitential communication” privileged from disclosure. We refile our original opinion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. RatliffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. E.L.B.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Nicholson v. Wittig, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Doe 2 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API