Techler v. Norstrub
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1DissentLane, Judge
I conclude that the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to appellees should be reversed and that the case should be remanded to the Patent Office for a determination of the entitlement of appellees to a reissue patent under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 251. I agree with the conclusions of the majority concerning appellees’ support for the counts, and I agree that the interests of justice are served by presently reviewing and supporting the board’s holding on that question. However, I do not believe that the decision of the board in the form of an award of priority…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Langer v. KaufmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Edwin J. Vandenberg v. William B. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Dalton H. Pritchard and Alfred C. Schroeder v. Bernard D. LoughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966