Legal Opinion · Dissent

Techler v. Norstrub

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 5, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8877Published

1DissentLane, Judge

I conclude that the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to appellees should be reversed and that the case should be remanded to the Patent Office for a determination of the entitlement of appellees to a reissue patent under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 251. I agree with the conclusions of the majority concerning appellees’ support for the counts, and I agree that the interests of justice are served by presently reviewing and supporting the board’s holding on that question. However, I do not believe that the decision of the board in the form of an award of priority…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Langer v. KaufmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Edwin J. Vandenberg v. William B. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Dalton H. Pritchard and Alfred C. Schroeder v. Bernard D. LoughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API