Andrew v. Benight-Latcham Carpet Co.

Dependant in error filed its complaint alleging that it had employed the defendant to superintend certain alterations in a building recently rented by it; that he had collected from the plaintiff sums as paid out to mechanics *473on said work in excess of the sums actually paid; and, upon learning that fact, plaintiff discharged him, and took possession of the building; that immediately thereafter he broke into the building and resumed and retained possession of it by force, thus delaying the work of alteration of said rented premises. Plaintiff prayed for an injunction restraining the defendant…