Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Reynolds

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 2, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for Rent.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles G. Neely, Judge, presiding. Heard in the. Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1898.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Horton

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was commenced by appellee to recover from appellant for rent claimed to be due upon a written lease. There were two suits for different installments which were consolidated and tried as one suit. The abstract of record filed by appellant is very incomplete, but we understand that the pleadings, as finally settled, are a declaration in covenant, a plea of non est faotum and a plea of release. Ho testimony was offered under the plea of non est faotum. The only contested issue is upon the plea of release. The issue thus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lambert v. BordenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882
  2. Goldstein v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  3. Prussing v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Nathan v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blue Island Brewing Co. v. FraatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  2. Crone v. GarstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. OehneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. McRea v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API