State v. Bauguess
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lee District Court. — TIon. IIenry Bank, J udge. Defendant was indicted and tried for the crime of lewdness and from a judgment of conviction prosecutes this appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Waterman, J:
I. The only matters seriously urged relate to the sufficiency of the indictment. The material portion of that instrument is as follows: “That A. M. Bauguess, on the 28th day of June, 1897, at the township of Madison, in the county of Lee and state aforesaid, did willfully, unlawfully, and designedly make an open, indecent, and obscene exposure of his person in a public place, to-wit, at or near Pine street, on the north side of Sixth street, in the city of Fort Madison,” etc. -
1 II. The first point sought to be made by appellant is that the indictment is fatally defective in not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- State v. HazleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859
- State v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Roberto Flores-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- State v. GalbreathWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.