Legal Opinion

Ramsek v. Beshear

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided August 22, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00036Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT TONY RAMSEK, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil No. 3:20-cv-00036-GFVT ) v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREW BESHEAR, in his official ) & capacity as Governor of Kentucky, et al., ) ORDER ) Defendants. *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. [R. 70.] For the reasons that follow, this motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I On March 6, 2020, Governor Andrew Beshear issued Executive Order 2020-215, which declared…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API