Legal Opinion
Arthur C. Schmid, Jr. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 22, 1971No. 493-69PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COLLINS, Judge.
This case comes to us on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. There is no dispute as to the facts.
On June 27, 1969, Arthur C. Schmid, Jr., plaintiff herein, was involuntarily released from active duty as a member of the United States Naval Reserve. On the date of his release plaintiff had attained the rank of lieutenant and was receiving a base pay of $753 per month. He had served 4 years, 6 months, and 27 days of continuous active duty, beginning November 30, 1964. Previously, he had served on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McLaren v. FleischerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Clifford L. Lionberger, D.B.A. Lionberger's Auto Parts v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, EpaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Zambardino v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Joe Kannikal v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.