Legal Opinion

Kuffel v. United States

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1968No. 8422PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFARLAND, Chief Justice.

Appellant Lorren J. Kuffel appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of appellee United States of America who was an intervenor below in the garnishment proceedings instituted by appellant against Stephen M. A. Young, defendant-debtor. Appellant contends the lower court erred in holding that a federal tax lien was prior to Kuffel’s garnishment lien and refusing to set any part of the garnisheed funds aside as attorney’s fees for Kuffel’s attorney.

The facts of this case are undisputed. Kuffel was a resident of California, and was in the business of selling truck and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States v. Pioneer American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance v. TroutCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pomona MacHinery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re Lester D. Lane and Bonnie F. Lane, Debtors. Hurst Concrete Products, Inc. v. Lester D. Lane Bonnie F. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API