Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. Essington

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1904No. 4433PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original Proceeding in Disbarment.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steele

The information charges that the respondent, •while engaged in the practice of law in the city of Denver with one Michael Waldron, under the firm name of Essington & Waldron, received from one Dimock Bruce the sum of about three hundred and fifty dollars for the purpose of loaning upon chattel security. That the said respondent appropriated a large sum thereof to his own use. That of the moneys so received by said firm a loan of forty dollars was made to one Annie Watson, and that as security a gold chain- was deposited with the firm. That the respondent, without the knowledge or consent of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Noyes v. AllisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re MashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Burns v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. In re TalbotIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Burns v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API