Legal Opinion
United States v. Blue Gacnik, United States of America v. Steven Carroll Gade, United States of America v. Antonio Estevan Sandoval
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1995No. 94-1126, 94-1135 and 94-1140PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Blue Gacnik, Steven Carroll Gade, and Antonio Estevan Sandoval appeal the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines after each, in accordance with Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), entered a plea to conspiracy to manufacture explosive materials without a license, 18 U.S.C. § 371. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We affirm Messrs. Gade’s and Sandoval’s sentences, but remand Ms. Gacnik’s case for resentencing.
Background
In May 1993, Mr. Gade acquired a copy of a book entitled “The Anarchist’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Charles Verdel FarnsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Delfin Eduardo Toro-PelaezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Thomas W. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Hill, William D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.