Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bowman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 2003No. 2002-2182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On February 4, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a single-count complaint charging respondent, Scott Bowman, of Salem, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0058511, with several violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The respondent answered, admitting some allegations and disputing others.

{¶ 2} On July 26, 2002, a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline conducted a hearing. At the hearing, the parties agreed to amend the complaint by adding Count II, which charged a violation of DR 9-102(A) (attorney shall deposit and keep client funds in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Erie-Huron Counties Joint Certified Grievance Committee v. MilesOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Butler County Bar Ass'n v. GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Butler County Bar Ass'n v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Portage County Bar Ass'n v. MitchellOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Thomas Kline Realty v. Rogers, Unpublished Decision (9-2-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API