Legal Opinion

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Bradley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1999No. 99-1114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board, to which respondent concurs. A sanction of at least an indefinite *215suspension is warranted for misconduct that includes violations of DR 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3), and 9-102(B). See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinstatler (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 220, 556 N.E.2d 521; Disciplinary Counsel v. Hipp (1990), 48 Ohio St.3d 16, 548 N.E.2d 947. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, and his reinstatement is conditioned on his making restitution of $15,000 to Piazza plus interest at a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HippOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ReinstatlerOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HoskinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API