Legal Opinion

Martin v. Harrington & Richardson, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 12, 1984No. 83-2514PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

During January of 1981, Donovan and James Barnes shot and killed Larry Martin and wounded Kenneth Jackson. Plaintiffs seek to recover for the injuries suffered by the two men, but not from the Barnes brothers, who have little or no money. Plaintiffs have instead filed this diversity action against Harrington and Richardson (H & R), the manufacturer of the gun used by the Barnes’s, alleging that the gun was an unreasonably dangerous product and that H & R was therefore strictly liable for the damage caused by the weapon. The district court found no support for plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BlasiusIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Palmer v. Avco Distributing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Rios v. Niagara MacHine & Tool WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fitz Simons & Connell Co. v. Braun & FittsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Young v. Bryco ArmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. American Cyanamid Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Perkins v. F.I.E. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Tanya Copier, Deceased, by and Through Bree Renee Lindsey, Her Personal Representative v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Delahanty v. HinckleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API