Legal Opinion

Perkins v. F.I.E. Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1985No. Nos. 83-3451, 83-3591PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs in this consolidated appeal seek to recover damages from the manufacturers of small caliber handguns that caused severe injury during the perpetration of one crime and the death of the victim in another crime. The plaintiffs present two theories of recovery. First, they argue that the marketing of a dangerous weapon to the general public is an ultrahazardous activity giving rise to absolute liability under Louisiana law. Second, they argue that the handgun used in the two crimes is an unreasonably dangerous product giving rise to strict products…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Loescher v. ParrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. Entrevia v. HoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Roberts v. Cardinal Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kelley v. R.G. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Fred H. Ainsworth and Gloria Ainsworth v. Shell Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API