Legal Opinion

Henretty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 29, 2015No. 1D14-590PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Scott Phillip Henretty appeals his conviction and sentence, arguing that fundamental error occurred when the trial court failed to renew the offer of counsel prior to Henretty entering his plea and failed to renew the offer prior to the imposition of sentence. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(5), if a waiver of counsel is accepted at any stage of the proceedings, the trial court shall renew the offer of counsel at each subsequent stage of the proceedings. Both plea hearings and sentencing are considered critical stages that require the renewal of the offer of counsel.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Beard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Birlkey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Hinson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  3. Hinson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API