Birlkey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtKlingensmith, J.
George Birlkey (“appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s finding that he violated probation (“VOP”) and consequent eighteen-month prison sentence (with credit for time served). Appellant, who represented himself while accompanied ■with standby counsel, asserts that the trial court erred in not renewing an offer of assistance of counsel prior to the VOP hearing and sentencing. We agree that the court should have renewed the offer of counsel before sentencing, and reverse.
Appellant was placed on probation after pleading no contest to the charges of burglary of a structure and possession of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- KANDACE M. WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Carliovis Bandera-Valier v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- Curtis Leroy Sherrod, II v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- RAYMOND PLATT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- UREL A. BARRETT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023