McNutt v. Yates
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKenneth S. Hixon, Judge
I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Shauna’s motion for a continuance, and I also concur that we must reverse and remand for entry of an order consistent with the law regarding modifications of child-support orders. However, 19I dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the change of custody from Shauna to Matthew. I would reverse the custody change because the trial court clearly erred in finding that Matthew proved a material change in circumstances.
In awarding a change of custody to Matthew only seven months after…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carter v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Ingram v. Century 21 Caldwell RealtyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996