Legal Opinion

Red House Furniture Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1983No. 8218DC945Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Sheriff Gibson contends that the court erred in concluding that he, through his deputy, failed to take possession of the property described in the writ of possession and deliver it to the court and otherwise failed to execute the writ and that he had failed to show any defense as to why the judgment nisi should not be made absolute. Relying upon State v. Whitaker, 107 N.C. 802, 12 S.E. 456 (1890) and State v. Armfield, 9 N.C. 246 (1822), which hold that an officer may not break and enter a building against the consent of the owner for the purpose of making a levy on the goods…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vitale v. Hotel California, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Richardson v. . WickerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Swain v. . PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. BROGDEN PRODUCE COMPANY v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. . ArmfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API