Legal Opinion
Cascadia Wildlands v. Adcock
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 24, 2025No. 6:22-cv-01344Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CASCADIA WILDLANDS and Case No. 6:22-cv-01344-MTK OREGON WILD, OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. CHERYL ADCOCK and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendants. _________________________________________ KASUBHAI, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action alleging violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”)
42 U.S.C. §§ 4321
et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”)
5 U.S.C. §§ 701
et seq., against the United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.