Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Howard v. Wickham

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 12, 2020No. 3:16-cv-00665Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 LAMONT HOWARD, Case No. 3:16-cv-00665-HDM-CLB 11 Petitioner, v. ORDER 12 HAROLD WICKHAM, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 This counseled habeas petition pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

16 comes before the court for consideration of the merits of the 17 amended petition (ECF No. 21). Respondents have answered (ECF No. 18 50), and petitioner Lamont Howard (“Howard”) has replied (ECF No. 19 58). 20 In addition, Howard has moved for an evidentiary hearing. 21 (ECF No. 60). Respondents have opposed (ECF No. 61), and Howard 22 has replied…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API