Adamski v. Miller

OPINION

CASTILLE, Justice.

This case involves an insurance coverage dispute over whether there was sufficient evidence at trial to establish that a third-party had the permission of the policyholder to use the insured automobile, thereby making the insurer liable for damages resulting from the third-party’s use of the policyholder’s car. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the Superior Court, which held that the evidence was not sufficient to render the insurance company liable.

The underlying history giving rise to this matter is that Ronald Miller, while driving a car owned by his…