Legal Opinion

Ramirez Escobar v. Midland Credit Management

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 9, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00819Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOSE RAMIREZ ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, No. 3:18-cv-819 (MPS) v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, Defendant. RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Jose Ramirez Escobar, brings this suit against Defendant, Midland Credit Management (“Midland”), alleging that Midland violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”),

15 U.S.C. §§ 1692

et seq. ECF No. 18. The Plaintiff has filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to his claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. ECF No. 51. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API