Chicago Milwaukee Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
INTRODUCTION
The merits of this case relate to plaintiff’s suit to recover employment taxes imposed by the Railroad Retirement Tax Act1 (“RRTA”) which were, allegedly, overpaid.2 However, presently before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under RCFC 12(b)(1) and (4), respectively. The government asserts as a basis for its motion taxpayer’s non-compliance with applicable Treasury regulations in its administrative…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago Milwaukee Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Chicago Milwaukee Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Chicago Milwaukee Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Chicago Milwaukee Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998