Legal Opinion
Witzke v. Hiller
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 18, 1997No. Civil Action 96-40284PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiff, Scott Andrew Witzke’s (“Witzke”), motion for reconsideration of this court’s May 20, 1997 sua sponte order dismissing plaintiffs complaint. See Witzke v. Hiller et al., 966 F.Supp. 538 (E.D.Mich.1997). In that order, this court applied the “three strikes” provision of § 1915(g) of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) to the instant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 plaintiff and held that his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) complaint mandated dismissal.
Witzke initially filed the instant motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lee Hampton v. Ron HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- James R. Kincade v. Emmit L. Sparkman, Warden Commonwealth of Kentucky, Anthony L. Hereford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Arthur X. Carson v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Lokmar Y. Abdul-Wadood v. Sylvester Nathan, Lokmar Y. Abdul-Wadood v. Conrado Delrosario and Adriane Jaggers, Lokmar Y. Abdul-Wadood v. Todd KamleiterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Witzke v. HillerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Merriweather v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2008
- Bye v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Elite Health Ctrs., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Carhartt, Inc. v. Innovative Textiles, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Arthur v. HeplerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.