Legal Opinion

City Lumber Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 9, 1968No. R. D. 11557; Reappraisement R62/3973 etcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Judge;

The three appeals enumerated in the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof were consolidated for purposes of trial. The imported merchandise consists of gray portland cement invoiced as “LIZ” brand complying with specifications ASTM C 150/56, Type 1. The cement in the first two appeals was exported from Portugal on May 7, 1960, and June 9, 1960, respectively, and was entered at Bridgeport, Conn, for the account of City Lumber Co. The cement in the third appeal was exported from Portugal on August 1, 1960, and was entered at Philadelphia, Pa., for the account of Port…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  2. City Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. City Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Melex USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  5. Shandong TTCA Biochemistry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API